Loading....
Recent Article links:

Category 'Best Adapted Screenplay'

The LAMB Devours the Oscars - Best Adapted Screenplay

 Editor’s note: Welcome to the nineteenthof a 33-part series dissecting the 83rd Academy Awards, brought to you by the Large Association of Movie Blogs and its assorted members. Every day leading up to the Oscars, a new post written by a different LAMB will be published, each covering a different category of the Oscars. To read any other posts regarding this event, please click the tag following the post. Thank you, and enjoy!

by Jason from The Entertainment Junkie

I’m currently taking a class called Russian Literature in World Cinema. On the first day of class, my professor asked us one question: what makes a good adaptation of a book into a movie? It’s a complicated question. For me, movies are more like short stories, whereas television series/miniseries are more like novels.  Therefore, when a book is adapted into a movie, I see it as editing a novel into a short story: things are going to have to be cut. Sometimes those things are subplots, sometimes background characters, and sometimes little moments of character development. The success of an adaptation, then, comes from how the screenwriter preserves the essence of the literature he’s adapting: does the film keep the main plot, and do the natures of the main characters remain intact? 2007’s Adapted Screenplay category had an example of success and failure: the Coens’ No Country for Old Men script perfectly embodied the nihilism of Cormac McCarthy’s novel, while Christopher Hampton’s Atonement screenplay lost Ian McEwan’s gorgeous novel (though I should say that no film version could really do justice to McEwan’s magnificent use of the English language).

I wish I could judge this year’s crop of adapted screenplays on how well they are adapted from their source material, but of the four films that are based works of literature, I have read none of them. So I can only judge based on the screenplays themselves, though I encourage anyone who has read the source material to offer their comparisons. The films are also ranked in order of how deserving of the Oscar I think they are.

1.    The Social Network; screenplay by Aaron Sorkin, based on The Accidental Billionaires by Ben Mezrich

There’s a major backlash against The Social Network right now: those who hailed the film as the best of the year and an instant masterpiece are now referring to it as overrated, and the various awards groups have now decided that, after two months of fawning over the film, The King’s Speech is the best film of all time. I, on the other hand, wasn’t crazy about the film from the very beginning; it’s a very good film, maybe even a borderline great film, but not one of the best of the year. That being said, there’s no denying Sorkin’s brilliant screenplay, which takes on a Rashomon-like structure that never sides with anyone, instead portraying all sides as deeply flawed men fueled by entitlement and/or hubris. The script is littered with great quips, true to Sorkin’s style (my favorite: “Dating you is like dating a Stairmaster.”). And the script does something that the final film glosses over: does singular ownership of anything exist anymore, and more importantly, did it ever exist to begin with? It’s taken a long time for Sorkin to finally earn an Oscar nomination, and he deserves the win.

 2.    Toy Story 3; screenplay by Michael Arndt, story by John Lasseter, Andrew Stanton, and Lee Unkrich

I don’t really understand why sequels are automatically considered adapted screenplays, since generally they’re original (well, relatively speaking) stories involving returning characters, rather than the same story told again, a la remakes. Therefore I don’t think Toy Story 3 deserves to be in this category, but should be considered an original screenplay instead. But what I think doesn’t matter, since its already been nominated as adapted, and nothing can change that now. The script for this film is excellent, full of heart and nostalgia for those, like me, who grew up with Toy Story. My biggest complaint is that there are too many new characters that don’t amount to much, and it seems to have more broad jokes in a Dreamworks manner that is, honestly, beneath the Pixar team. Still, there’s no denying that it deserved its nomination and, if not for The Social Network, the win.

3.    127 Hours; screenplay by Simon Beaufoy and Danny Boyle, based on Between a Rock and a Hard Place by Aron Ralston

Here’s an example of a film taking a very difficult premise and turning it into something incredible. However, I’m not sure how much of what made 127 Hours work was in the script; I think of it more as a feat of Danny Boyle’s frantic direction, Jon Harris’s quick-cut editing and James Franco’s magnetic performance. But all that had to come from somewhere, right? The script makes great use of Ralston’s inner thoughts, escaping into fantasy and memories while he is trapped deep in a Utah canyon. The script helps all the other elements come together to capture Ralston as the deeply human character he is, and the result, like it or not, is never boring.

 4.    True Grit; written for the screen by Ethan & Joel Coen, based on True Grit by Charles Portis

The Coens are quickly becoming a writing mainstay for the Academy, perhaps even to the point of finding a Woody Allen-esque level of love. The True Grit script is certainly well-crafted, complete with a lack of contractions and great moments of Coen-brand humor. However, like the film above, I think True Grit is more of a feat of the Coens’ direction, Roger Deakins’ gorgeous cinematography (please let him win the Oscar for this) and the strong performances, particularly from LEAD actress Hailee Steinfeld. That’s not a knock against the screenplay, but I don’t think it was the strongest element of the film.

5.    Winter’s Bone; screenplay by Debra Granik and Anne Rosellini, based on Winter’s Bone by Daniel Woodrell
I was not a major fan of Winter’s Bone either, despite many people’s obvious love for the film. Like The Social Network, I think it’s a good movie that flirts with greatness, but the movie’s strength lies in its stunning cast. The script takes various twists and turns that don’t have much of an impact on the page, and none of them are truly surprising. On its own, it’s not much, but once it’s put to film, every actor sells the story in a way that makes it haunting and great. But since we’re only judging screenplays here, I have to give it my last place spot.

Overall, a great crop of screenplays, if maybe not the strongest in recent years. Maybe one day I’ll be able to find out if they’re successful adaptations or not.

The LAMB Devours the Oscars - Best Adapted Screenplay

Editor’s note: Welcome to the sixth of a 33-part series dissecting the 82st Academy Awards, brought to you by the Large Association of Movie Blogs and its assorted members. Every day leading up to the Oscars, a new post written by a different LAMB will be published, each covering a different category of the Oscars. To read any other posts regarding this event, please click the tag following the post. Thank you, and enjoy!

By Nick Jobe of Random Ramblings of a Demented Doorknob.

We’ve been doing this for a few years, so there’s been plenty of history over the Best Adapted Screenplay already given. So I’ll just give you the basics. Simply, a movie can be nominated for Best Adapted Screenplay if the movie has been adapted from a novel, play, short story, TV show, or another movie (thanks Wikipedia!).

Now, I’d go through the list of all past winners and whatnot, but these days, does it really matter? Taste has changed in film, and the dudes at the Academy vote for much different films these days than they might have back in the day. So I just wanna take a look at the last decade of wins before getting into those nominated this year.

2000
Winner: Traffic
Based on: Teleplay
Genre: Crime Drama

Personally, I would have gone with the clever Coen Brothers’ script for O Brother, Where Art Thou? But apparently the Academy didn’t agree. They went with this crime drama instead.

2001
Winner: A Beautiful Mind
Based on: Novel
Genre: Biography Drama

No real opinion one way or the other. This film was total Oscar bait, and the Academy took it.

2002
Winner: The Pianist
Based on: Novel
Genre: Biography Drama

Apparently the Academy likes their Bio-Dramas.

2003
Winner: Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King
Based on: Novel
Genre: Fantasy

This was totally out of the blue. Between such acclaimed films as City of God and Mystic River, the third film of a fantasy trilogy wins out. Granted, the series was quite a feat, and the film was awesome. But still… a rare win for the fantasy department.

2004
Winner: Sideways
Based on: Novel
Genre: Dramedy

A comedy. Another rare win for this category as of late. The Academy really likes their depressing dramas and crime thrillers, so for a quirky comedy about wine tasting to win is a rare feat indeed.

2005
Winner: Brokeback Mountain
Based on: Short Story
Genre: Western Drama Romance

This movie won for the same reason Sean Penn won for Milk. Don’t get me wrong–I’m all for gay rights. And I’ve yet to see the movie. But you know the movie won more for its subject matter than its actual screenplay.

2006
Winner: The Departed
Based on: Foreign Film
Genre: Crime Thriller

Our second crime film on the list, this film probably won because of its connection to Scorsese than its actual screenplay. Though when it’s up against the likes of Borat, who knows?

2007
Winner: No Country for Old Men
Based on: Novel
Genre: Crime Thriller

This year was a near-total sweep for this film. And boy was this a surprise. In this category, it was up against four depressing Oscar-bait films (Atonement, Away from Her, Diving Bell and the Butterfly, and There Will Be Blood). Yet the crime thriller won. The Academy has really been loving its crime films lately.

2008
Winner: Slumdog Millionaire
Based on: Novel
Genre: Crime Drama

Not a crime drama in the sense of the others on this list, but it does deal heavily with the subject (he is in an interrogation situation for most of the movie, and the bulk of the flashbacks deal with crime). So… yeah.

2009
Nominee: District 9
Based on: Short Story
Genre: Sci-Fi Drama

This is the dark horse of this category. I think if anything is going to beat Precious here, it’ll be this one. I mean, we had the epic fantasy and a gay western won, so why not an alien drama about Apartheid?

Nominee: An Education
Based on: Novel
Genre: Drama

It doesn’t have enough backing to win out over the more popular films on this list. Sure, it has a following, but I doubt it’ll win it.

Nominee: In The Loop
Based on: TV Series
Genre: Comedy

See: An Education. Plus, do “adapted from a teleplay” films ever win? (Yeah, I know, Traffic. But that was so 2000.)

Nominee: Precious
Based on: Novel
Genre: Drama

I’m figuring this is the front runner of this category. It’s a total Oscar-bait film, not to mention that, while it isn’t categorized as a crime drama, it deals with some criminal acts. And we know how our Academy likes its crime films. But I’ve just had this feeling for a while that Precious is gonna sweep the Oscars.

Nominee: Up in the Air
Based on: Novel
Genre: Dramedy

The last dramedy to win was back in 2004. And, in my opinion, it was more drama than comedy, whereas this feels more comedy than drama. I doubt it’ll win based on the past (and on its competitors), but who knows?

Prediction: With its subject matter/genre, and the fact more novels have won than short stories (or anything else), I say Precious for the win, but District 9 for the upset(?). (Here’s to rooting for the latter.)

The LAMB Devours the Oscars - Best Adapted Screenplay

Editor’s note: Welcome to the thirteenth of a 24-part series dissecting the 81st Academy Awards, brought to you by the Large Association of Movie Blogs and its assorted members. Every day leading up to the Oscars, a new post written by a different LAMB will be published, each covering a different category of the Oscars. To read any other posts regarding this event, please click the tag following the post. Thank you, and enjoy!

By Jennifer of The Dueling Cavalier

I think usually the Best Adapted Screenplay goes to the movie that goes on to win Best Picture. Which is predictable and boring, but there you go. The Academy is not exactly known for its dramatic surprises. It’s known to pull a shocker out of its sleeve from time to time, but usually not in the Adapted Screenplay category.

But what, exactly, does Best Adapted Screenplay mean? According to Wikipedia it’s awarded to the writer who made the transition from book/play/short story to film look the easiest. Basically, who took a crappy novel and made it palatable enough for the silver screen?

This year the nominees matched the Best Picture nominees almost name for name, with the exception of Doubt. Well, I like to read, and even though I’ve only read one of the nominees beginning to end, I have watched all of them and that puts me pretty much on par with the rest of the Academy. This year we have two plays (Doubt and Frost/Nixon), two novels (The Reader and Q&A aka Slumdog Millionaire) and one short story (”The Curious Case of Benjamin Button”).

The Reader, a novel by Bernard Schlink, addresses generational guilt issues and personal and moral issues coming into conflict. A young German boy begins a secret love affair with a woman old enough to be his mother and against his better judgment falls in love with her. One day she suddenly disappears and he goes on with his life. Then he sees her in court as a defendant. It turns out she served as a Nazi prison guard at Auschwitz during WWII and was responsible for the extermination of many, many Jews. The novel itself was on Oprah’s Book Club list, so I’m guessing it wasn’t a bad book to begin with. And the movie that was made with wasn’t bad per se, particularly not as bad as most Dark Knight fanatics make it out to be, but it sure is Oscar-baity. Illicit love, dramatic atonement scenes, illiteracy, the horrors of the NAZIS. But it’s not a book solely about the Holocaust and I think in general this was a solid reinterpretation from page to screen. It reminded me of Minghella’s work (RIP!) in so many ways, but I think that was more the direction than anything else. So, not a bad job.

Q&A, a novel by Vikas Swarup, adapted into Slumdog Millionaire. If what the critics say is true, the original book was not that good. And I believe it. Half the time I was watching the movie I was thinking how this movie shouldn’t be working, but it somehow was. An uneducated “slumdog” called Jamal (I think he’s called Ram in the novel) wins 20 million rupees on the gameshow Who Wants to be a Millionaire? because d) it is written. Plus, he’s in love with a chick named Latika and he gets her too. With every question we flashback to a time in Jamal’s life, a memorable moment that caused him to just know the answer. You see how this can get tiresome? But somehow the adaptors add just enough variation to the story and in the end you’re surprised by much you enjoyed it. At least I was.

“The Curious Case of Benjamin Button”, a short story by F. Scott Fitzgerald. Now this one I have actually read, and the story is kinda boring. Sue me, but I don’t like Fitzgerald. Essentially the story is about how Benjamin Button grows younger. He has a wife, and a kid, and he progresses from taking care of them to them taking care of him. Then he dies when he’s a baby. Factually the details are not the same at all, but I think the movie managed to grasp upon the story’s fundamental theme – whether we go from womb to tomb or the other way around life is still short and filled with complications – quite well. And they added a love story, which was cute but not cloying, and a visual feast for the eyes. Many compare it to Forrest Gump, but I see no such similarities other than the whole progress-through-history-thing.

Doubt: A Parable, a play by John Patrick Shanley. A play about moral ambiguity and yes, doubt. Set in a rigid Catholic school trying to adapt to the changing racial environment, the ultra-conservative Sister Aloysius wages a verbal battle against the more liberal Father Flynn about whether he sexually abused a black student. Whether the allegations are true or not, Sister Aloysius has no proof whatsoever and the vendetta seems to be more personal if anything else. It’s a meaty, literary type of play, and one much better suited on the stage than on celluloid. Here the themes play awkwardly and Shanley doesn’t take advantage of film’s spacious medium to connect with the audience on a personal level. It’s a weighty story, to be sure, but not a particularly good one.

Frost/Nixon, a play by Peter Morgan. The story was fundamentally unchanged. Basically the tv show host David Frost hosts a series of interviews with the recent-resigned Richard Nixon and tries to coax a confession out of him. At its root the play is an intense character study drawing parallels between two superficially different men. I know I’m in the minority when I say this, but I thought it was one of the best movies of the year. I think play adaptations are the hardest to pull off, because usually the original playwrights do it. I don’t think they exactly have a good scope of how expansive movies can really be since they’re so used to the constricts of the stage. Now I haven’t seen the play itself, but I can imagine this film version to be better. We got some actual scenery, some seamless scene transitions, and the dialogue wasn’t as stilted as plays can get to be. And, you know, the characters got to move around a little too.

Prediction: Slumdog Millionaire, and I’m willing to bet a sizeable amount of money on this one. At this point the momentum of Slumdog is too huge to be ignored, and it’s quite a good adaptation to boot.

If I had a vote: The Curious Case of Benjamin Button. Here is a case where the story was almost entirely created by the authors. Basically Swicord and Roth took the fundamental premise of Fitzgerald’s story – that living is hard no matter which way you’re going – and stretched it into an unconventional love story also relevant to today’s current events. It did have a humongous running time, however - but I wouldn’t say it was ever boring.

The LAMB Devours the Oscars - Best Adapted Screenplay

Editor’s note: Welcome to the fifth of a multi-part series dissecting the 2008 Academy Awards, brought to you by the Large Association of Movie Blogs and its assorted members. Every weekday leading up to the Oscars, a new post written by a different LAMB will be published, each covering a different category (or more) of the Oscars (there are 24 in all). To read any other posts regarding this event, please just click on the tag following the post. Thank you, and enjoy!

By Mike from 5th Row From the Screen

I was amused when I got randomly assigned the writing duties for the nominees in the Best Adapted Screenplay category. At the top of my head, this award indicated to me that a writer gets recognized for successfully converting a work of literature – a book – into a movie. I thought, “Oh, this is just funny! Give the Best Adapted Screenplay category to the guy who hardly reads books!” Haha.

Seriously, I found it quite a challenge to write about this category as I haven’t seen any of the nominated films [I’m in the Philippines and none of Oscar bets in this category have made it to our cinemas yet]. But since I am a writer and I love movies, I thought I’d just go with the flow and wing it. So, here goes.

The Academy Award for Best Adapted Screenplay is given each year to the outstanding writer of a screenplay adapted from another source – usually a novel, play, or short story but also sometimes another film [Thank you Wikipedia!]. Since the year 2000, I have had the privilege of viewing the winners of this category – with the exception of 2004’s Sideways and 2006’s The Departed. The films that had won this writing award – Traffic (2000), A Beautiful Mind (2001), The Pianist (2002), The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King (2003), and Brokeback Mountain (2005) – are some of the best and memorable I’ve seen in terms of storytelling. And while I haven’t read the source materials for these winners, the quality of their screenplays spoke volumes about the ability of their respective screenwriters to retool an existing narrative, tweak it, improve it and make it cinema-friendly.

This year, the source materials for the nominated films in the Best Adapted Screenplay category are three novels, a memoir and a short story. Of the writers nominated here, two have recently received awards for their screenplays; one is a previous Oscar winner in this category; one is a previous Oscar winner for Best Original Screenplay; and one is a first time director and screenwriter.

Here is the break down:

+ One source material is a novel about a writer who seeks to make amends by penning a book about what could have been a happy-ever-after in the life of her sister and her sister’s lover. Atonement is adapted from Ian McEwan’s novel of the same name and translated as a story for the big screen by Christopher Hampton. This is one of the two nominees in this category that already received a writing award (the Satellite Award for Best Adapted Screenplay). Many critics have called the film a “successful adaptation of McEwan’s novel”, and have included Atonement in their best films of 2007 lists. This could be an indication of an Oscar win.

+ A short story about a couple whose union goes through the acid test of Alzheimer’s is the source material for Sarah Polley’s directorial debut. Away From Her, which Polley adapted for the screen, is based on Alice Munro’s short story entitled “The Bear Came Over the Mountain.” The plot has a bit of The Notebook feel to it (the Alzheimer’s thingy) and has yet to win an award in the screenwriting category. However, Away From Her has also made it to several critics’ top ten list for best films in 2007. That should count for something, right?

+ The French are no strangers to the Oscars, with their films, directors and actors getting attention – and the little golden statuette – in the Academy Award ceremonies. This year, a memoir written by French journalist and author Jean-Dominique Bauby is the basis for the film The Diving Bell and the Butterfly. The movie focuses on the life, memories and imaginations of Bauby after he suffers a massive stroke leaving him awake and aware but immobile and with very limited means of communication. Academy Award winning screenwriter Ronald Harwood (Best Adapted Screenplay for The Pianist) penned the script for this Julian Schnabel-directed film. The Oscar under Harwood’s belt could weigh in on the Academy’s evaluation for the nominees in this category. Or not! We’ll see.

+ A novel about a hunt and pursuit drama between a local sheriff on the verge of retirement, a professional hit man who has no hesitations about taking lives, and a welder hunting pronghorn but instead finds $2 million dollars, is the source material for the film No Country for Old Men. The script was adapted by Joel and Ethan Coen from Cormac McCarthy’s novel of the same name. The Coen brothers, who already have an Oscar to their name (Best Original Screenplay for 1996’s Fargo) and who recently won the Golden Globe for Best Screenplay – Motion Picture, may be looking at their second Academy Award win in this category.

+ Loosely based on Upton Sinclair’s 1927 novel entitled “Oil!,” There Will Be Blood focuses on the life of silver prospector-turned-oil businessman Daniel Plainview and how his greed and need to beat out all other competition lead him to a downward spiral laden with deception, manipulation and murder. The story was adapted for the screen by director Paul Thomas Anderson and critics have high praises for the film, even including There Will Be Blood on their lists of best films of 2007. The movie has yet to win in the screenwriting categories of other award-giving bodies and that may indicate its fate in the Oscars.

My two-cents

The popular contenders in this category are the last two mentioned above: No Country for Old Men and There Will Be Blood. If the Golden Globe Awards are any indication, I would say the Oscar for Best Adapted Screenplay will go to the Coen brothers for their adaptation of Cormac McCarthy’s novel – they nabbed the Globes, didn’t they? And there wasn’t even Blood in the Golden Globes’ Best Screenplay nominees list. But you know what, your guess is probably just as good as mine…

…oh wait! Your guess is actually probably much better than mine, since you’ve no doubt seen some or all of these nominated films…

…and I haven’t!

February 24th. We’ll see.

Categories