Loading....
Recent Article links:

Category 'Journalistic Skepticism'

PLUG: Journalistic Skepticism

Luke here from Journalistic Skepticism (http://lukecurtis.blogspot.com/). I just recently announced my year-end nominees for my 16th annual film, television, and music awards, the LCT Awards. In honor of the occasion, I’ve just launched a brand new official website (http://www.wix.com/lctatge/lctawards). It’s still partially under construction, but please stop by, join in some year-end polls, check out some of my questionable history in film taste, and hit up my blog with qualms or comments.

Thanks!

Luke

Got a Press Release, something to Plug, or a Screener available for review (or some combination of the three)? Ok, don’t get all crazy about it. Just click here and give me the details (what, when, where, and a link, for starters) - I’ll handle the rest.

For Your Consideration: The Cultural Post, Four of Them, Detailed Criticisms, and Journalistic Skepticism

Hey you! Send me an FYC image and I will put it up! I don’t care if I get one from 50 sites, I’ll find a way to get them all up, and as soon as possible (the nomination voting period only lasts until May 12th!). When you’re ready to vote, do it here: http://www.misterpoll.com/polls/482056

[Editor’s Note: I’d really have preferred to give everyone their own post, but I’m quickly realizing that with loads of new LAMBs waiting to be posted, 40+ FYCs, all our other features, and less than 12 days until the voting ends, I’m just not going to be able to. So you’re getting four-packs of FYCs from here on out. I hope no one thinks this unfair - better this than the ads not being posted until after the voting is over.]

FYC #18 is for LAMB #206, The Cultural Post.

FYC #19 is for LAMB #512, Four of Them.

FYC #20 is for LAMB #450, Detailed Criticisms.

FYC #21 is for LAMB #428, Journalistic Skepticism.

The LAMB Devours the Oscars - Best Original Score

Editor’s note: Welcome to the fifth of a 33-part series dissecting the 82st Academy Awards, brought to you by the Large Association of Movie Blogs and its assorted members. Every day leading up to the Oscars, a new post written by a different LAMB will be published, each covering a different category of the Oscars. To read any other posts regarding this event, please click the tag following the post. Thank you, and enjoy!

By Luke Tatge of Journalistic Skepticism.

Leave it to the Academy to do one or both of the following things every year with their picks for Best Original Score — to stick with what they know (basically, your Williamses, your Horners, your Zimmers, etc.) and to pick certain scores based solely on the fact that they have “hype.” So begins the discussion of the five nominees for Best Original Score for the 2009 Oscars.

James Horner, Avatar
A perennial Oscar favorite, Horner has been nominated eight times in this category, a relative favorite of the Academy. Strangely enough, though, he’s only ever won the award for his work with James Cameron (1997’s Titanic). And not so strangely enough, as is typical in much of Horner’s work, there is a lot of borrowing from his previous efforts. The score includes his signature love of lulled “aahs” set to a melody (see Titanic for an example) as well as several dramatic, rousing portions as well. It actually slightly resembles the work of James Newton Howard in the little-seen 2000 Disney flick Dinosaur. Check it out for yourself, and you’ll hear the resemblances. Aside from its similarities to other scores, Avatar is a relatively standard choice for the Academy - an adventure movie with lots of sweeping strings and battle scenes set to emotional cues. It’s a decent score all in all, and it’s probably the front-runner in the category, as Avatar seems set for a sweep in the technical categories.

Alexandre Desplat, Fantastic Mr. Fox
An odd, off-beat choice for the typically stuffier category, chalk this nod up to the fact that Desplat is one of the newest members of the score boys’ club (he’s gotten three nominations in this category in the last four years). Desplat seems to be a light in the tunnel of all-too-similar work being churned out by his fellow composers. Of his three nominated scores - Fox, The Queen, and Benjamin Button - they have virtually no striking resemblances. This one banks on quirky six-stringed instruments to create a truly Wes Anderson vibe within an animated context. The score is a fitting companion to the movie itself. And though it doesn’t really stand a chance - I’d say it lands in the fourth slot of vote-getters - it’s a surprising and pleasing entry in the list of five.

Marco Beltrami and Buck Sanders, The Hurt Locker
Well, this is one that fits the latter of the aforementioned rules - it’s a slightly confusing nominee that probably got lumped in to rack up the final count for The Hurt Locker. Though he’s been a composer for some time, Beltrami has enjoyed Oscar attention only in the last three years, having been nominated once before for 3:10 to Yuma. The score primarily consists of building dissonant notes to create intensity, which makes perfect sense for a nerve-wrecker about a bomb squad in war time. Unfortunately, it’s hardly a fitting choice if you’re on the lookout for a diverse, original score. In fact, you can see - or hear, rather - Beltrami’s experience with horror and thriller movies in this effort. Take a listen to some of Scream’s electronic score and it may sound a bit familiar. But out of apparent sheer love for the film, I’d place this in the third likeliest spot of the five.

Hans Zimmer, Sherlock Holmes
The insanely prolific composer (this his eighth Oscar nomination), Zimmer has dipped into just about every genre imaginable. He averaged about 3-4 scores per year this decade, so he just may be the busiest person in the film music business. Typically his scores tend to run together as far as memorability, but I’m one who would say that his efforts in Sherlock Holmes are notable for their relative uniqueness. He meshes the action and mystery genres incredibly well with the late 19th Century vibe combined with the modern kick-assery vibe. His odds to win, though, seem slim. I’d place him in the fifth spot, in fact. The last time he won (which was once) was 1994’s megahit The Lion King.

Michael Giacchino, Up
Another new unique voice in the Original Score gang, Giacchino is on his second nomination (the first for 2007’s Ratatouille), though it’s rather, well, incredible that his possible best score, the one for The Incredibles, managed to miss out on an Oscar nod. His score for Up is both emotionally gut-wrenching and thrillingly epic, something that some other nominees seem to lack. Though I think Horner has this one in the bag, Giacchino’s got to have the number two spot. He managed the BFCA, the Golden Globe, several critics awards, and, most recently, the Grammy. And with five total nominations for the movie, it seems like it has to win somewhere, with this being the next most likely after Best Animated Feature.

So it seems that Avatar or Up has this in the bag, but what of the other scores of the year? Some notable snubs include Marvin Hamlisch’s score for The Informant!, which was nominated by the BFCA, the Globes, and the Chicago critics; Giacchino’s score for Star Trek, which managed a Grammy nod and a win from the Las Vegas critics; and Abel Korzeniowski’s score for A Single Man, which was nominated at the Globes and took home the San Diego critics’ prize. And then there are my personal favorites that missed mentions, for your perusal: Randy Newman for The Princess and the Frog, Joe Hisaishi for Ponyo, Sergey Yevtushenko for The Last Station, and Christopher Young for Drag Me To Hell.

LAMB #428 - Journalistic Skepticism

URL: http://lukecurtis.blogspot.com/
Site Name: Journalistic Skepticism
Categories: Reviews, Editorials, Humor, Classic Film, General
Rating: PG-13

What is the main focus of your site?
The main focus of my site is to draw attention to a variety of movies through lists, analysis, commentary on films past and present, revisiting critical decisions and film awards, paying tribute to the best in the film industry, and paying homage to unsung films that didn’t get their due credit.

What are your blogging goals, personally and/or professionally? In other words, what, if anything, are you trying to get out your blog?
I would love to reach a large audience with my blog (and I believe I have a growing one already). I’m very passionate about film and have been since growing up memorizing the Oscar winners and recording the telecast to watch repeatedly. So what I hope to get out of the blog is an outlet to express my love of movies and to start conversations with other bloggers and readers about movies that have also changed their lives for better or worse.

Do you prefer an interactive community for your blog or are you the teacher and your readers the students?
I definitely prefer an interactive community. Since I started getting more readers at my blog and have swapped comments with fellow bloggers, I’ve found some kindred spirits out there who have similar tastes (and who have opposite tastes) that are great to hear about. I’m much more of a conversation starter than a conversation tyrant.

How long have you been movie blogging for, and how frequent do you post updates to your site?
I started seriously committing to my blog last summer as a means to maintain my interest in my career while I am stuck freelancing (I’m currently a journalist without a field-related job, go figure), and I update my blog very often. I would say I average 2-3 posts per day, and I also link my blog to my Facebook page, I have an official Twitter specifically for the blog, and I link to a related Web site that specifically deals with my personal film awards that I’ve assembled annually since 1995.

Name up to three of your favorite movies (and no more).
My all-time favorite is Bringing Up Baby. My number two may make me a boring traditionalist, but it’s The Godfather. And my number three is partially a sentimental favorite - Beauty and the Beast.

How did you hear about the LAMB?
I saw links to the blog/site on more than one of my blogger friends’ blogrolls.

Any additional comments, or give yourself an interview question that’s not listed above.
None.

Categories